My mentor, Diane Deseta at UXMentors assigned me an exercise to examine how Yahoo! implements their Yahoo's design pattern library throughout their site. This is one of several posts drawn from that assignment.
The exercise brought to light how complicated it is to follow conventions when there are competing motivations behind a page. In several instances, the patterns were ignored. Whether these divergences were created by or inherited by the recently fired SVP for User Experience Design Tim Parsey is impossible to know, the end result left my brow furrowed.
---------
Navigation Tabs - APPLIED WHERE
CONVENIENT - The use of navigation tabs is to provide a clear way for the user
to see where they are (in this case - in the Yahoo! News section) and easily
determine how to get to other parts of the site.
The place where this convention is ignored is
the number of tabs. The design pattern explicitly says no more than 10
tabs should be used though 13 appear here.
Why violate the pattern? I’m guessing there
are 13 individuals who have titles that correspond to curating the sections
delineated by those tabs.
The solution to this would seem pretty clear
cut - merge a couple of the tabs. Science/Health/Technology seem good
candidates, and "local" and "popular" don't even seem to be
the same kind of label, thereby further diluting the power of the convention.
Even the example given in the design pattern shows a different
implementation from the one being used on the live site.
Here’s the example given with the design
patterns:
Here’s the live page:
I'm guessing the people responsible for
curating the site have louder voices than those who compile the design patterns.
Page Grids - FOLLOWED - The layout of the page uses
the large column on the left and a thinner column on the right (the first
pattern shown among the four preferred layouts):
The pattern encourages the use of these grids
because:
· Templates
reduce designers' preparation time and let them focus more on the site's
content and features.
· Consistency
across pages and page elements contributes to a cohesive brand and user
experience.
· A
common source code offers a number benefits:
o Reduces
the number of subtle or major variations in the page layout.
o Expedites
development and global page updates.
The code for the page shows that a CSS and
HTML template was indeed used to lay out the page...these templates are likely
populated by the CMS used for news items (which, themselves, are also likely
auto-populated by content providers (in this case AP)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.